...Remember the various experiments the Japanese performed on prisoners of war during the 1940s? These subjects were going to be worked to death anyway, so why not put them to some scientific use? Back then we could see through such rationalizations. Not even the records of those experiments would be used.Read the rest of the column
[snip]
All seemed to understand what didn't have to be said back then: This research was . . . unclean. To touch it would be to defile oneself, and risk infection by the same ethical absence that motivated the experiments in the first place.
There is no scientific explanation for such a feeling; it is just there. Call it the wisdom of repugnance...
Van Gogh Has a Broken Heart by Russ Ramsey
-
Van Gogh Has a Broken Heart; What Art Teaches Us About the Wonder and
Struggle of Being Alive by Russ Ramsey. Zondervan, 2024. Russ Ramsey’s
first book abo...
18 hours ago
1 comment:
Amen.
When I look at the way embryos are just handed over for medical "experiments," I don't know which image to bear in mind:
1. Josef Mengele and his "experiments" on Jewish twins that were just fuel for the ovens anyay.
2. The scene from the Monty Pythonnn movie in which the "overpopulated" Catholic father announces that since he can't feed his brood any more, "it's medicall experiments for the lot of you."
Post a Comment