U.S. Rep. Nancy Pelosi, the incoming speaker of the House of Representatives, is supporting a move to give full voting rights to a representative from D.C., which trends left.
On the plus side, she is also supporting adding one more congressional seat for Utah, which trends conservative.
It's a nice bipartisan move, if you're sure you want D.C. to have a seat. Congress goes from 435 to 437 (just what we need, more politicians), but neither party gets more than the other.
In the inexplicable column, the deal as it stands wouldn't have Utah drawn into new districts, but would just add a statewide seat.
An at-large seat in Congress? Since when? On what authority?
I'm with Betsy Newmark, who says, "I don't understand how the Utah part of this bill would pass constitutional scrutiny. I'm not a lawyer or constitutional scholar, but this seems mighty fishy to me."
A Protectionist is Someone Who… - (Don Boudreaux) Tweet… when confronting indisputable evidence of protectionism’s costs dismisses this evidence as irrelevant because it is, the protectioni...
6 hours ago